|
2024-07-20 10:20 I'm so mad at some of us! We are just a bunch of f****** morons (all people that said that the norms are inflated, including myself). We werent happy that when you solve something you get a good result like 170. Now we will be happy for getting 150 for the same raw score yay! All we needed to do is to just keep quiet. I can't belive that we have done this s***! Now everything is at least 20 points lower than it used to be. The tests used to have high ceilings of 188 and even 190, but no sweat these new ceilings are even better 120 and 135+. To summarize this we DESERVE this because we are a bunch of morons f***. FFGF 2024-06-20 11:43 Sorry, I didn't mean to be rude or anything like that! Abc 2024-06-18 14:31 Alex explained it well enough. No need to continue the trolling, Abc. // Zolly 2024-06-16 13:27 Now, because of these guy/s we don't have a new contest, because Mr.Alex is mad. Why this forum is always a warzone. Why people can't just get along? Come on guys I still belive in good and in humanity! Abc 2024-05-23 17:25 Hello, I understand such concern, but this seems more of a personal attack-accusation. Afterall, the unnecessary mention of Matematrix may prove so. Zolly was given exclusive credit for Matematrix in the form; and also informed personally- As for the score, there was an official typo (correct solution, written incorrect). Point was granted right after official correction, as spotted by me. Paul most definitely must have forgotten of this, since my submission was in 2020, and I believe reverted it to 17/18 at some point in time, probably due to file overlap. Now with some elementary deduction, one could have possibly deduced that the "X" at 17/18 may have been mine, especially after apparently noticing Venus leaderboards, but I guess this was not something to entertain! Even so; this completely nullifies your pre-assuming attitude of supposedly "inflating" ZD Master's norm, it is in-fact by choice I have chosen the test to be the representative one in the leaderboard (as opposed to ZD legenda). As I believe that achieving similar results on ZD Master is a much harder feat, with beautiful and novel problems :) I personally offered to norm ZD Master for Zolly. I think it is the best test from the available, and much deserving of attention - extremely difficult too, by the way. Most Zolly Tests are heavily underrated (IMO), and I'd like to see some being procedurally normed. In addition, I do not particularly need the suggested "inflation" according to you, as there are multiple scores in this ball-park, which could serve as an alternative. i.e: EloLogics 24/24, Amoriq 31/33, Paxilux 31/32, etc. In fact; a second attempt on Amoriq would already suffice- Thankful to your keen observation, I have made a second attempt on ZD Legenda ! And for the moment being (test of choice to present in scoreboard). Mr. FFGF, feel free to try ZD Master, it must be a cakewalk for you. Alex.T 2024-05-20 15:20 Also letting your own testee (Alex Tolio) to norm the test that he has taken (ZD Master test), and publish the result 173 on the hall of fame, I don't know what to say to that kind of behaviour. I'm not saying that he added couple of points to be higher on the listing... ... but it is a possibility! FFGF 2024-05-20 11:49 Alex Tolio 177 iq disappearance MYSTERY. According to this site he got it on the first attempt on the ZD legenda test https://venushighiqsociety.org/index.php/world-gen ius-registry, but I don't see the x on the 18 177+ line here https://zollydarko.com/iq-tests/data.htm. I know I saw it there before. Can you please explain what is going on Mr. Zolly? And if you are wondering who replicated your test https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScyPmQSgE XXIsNvBty44TX_gU6JJZoudchPTgI-YoXBPk5Qsg/viewform it was that Alex Tolio guy! Wonders of the world 2024-04-14 11:36 Looks fine to me. Tim finland 2024-04-08 14:48 Im testing the guestbook! =) Feel free to write to me here. give feedback, etc. // Zolly |